Sunday, August 28, 2016

The Woman in Black

Entire movie contents below.


The movie opens with three little girls having a tea party with their dollies, having a lovely time.  Then, their heads turn, as if watching something or someone go across the room toward the windows - and they all walk together toward the three windows, open them, and all to their deaths.

So, I mean, it's cheerful straightaway.

Cut to Arthur Kipps (Daniel Radcliffe), a London attorney who is shaving with a straight razor.  Part of the reason I haven't seen this movie until now is that I couldn't imagine Harry Potter shaving, and with a straight razor, mon dieu!  But honestly, it's been long enough since this movie has come out that I'm over all that.  All I know now is that he's being torn away from his absurdly cute son for a few days to go off to Eel Marsh House because its owner, the widow Alice Drablow, has died.  The son and the nanny agree to meet Kipps at the end of the week out at Eel Marsh for some R&R.  Because that sounds lovely, right?  Somebody has to go from the firm, because the local man, Jerome, has not been cooperating.  Daniel Radcliffe has to be the one because he's already on his last legs at the firm - his beautiful and beloved wife, Stella, died during the birth of their son, and he has had more than his share of trouble.  The firm is tired of his crap.

On the train, he meets a man named Samuel Daily (Ciaran Hinds), who offers to drive him to his lodgings, the Gifford Arms.  Daily tells Kipps it's not likely he'll find a local buyer for the house...which gives him an idea of the treatment he's about to start receiving around town.  It's pretty much the last nice face he sees, because everyone else is trying to get him to leave town.  He gets to the hotel, and they make him stay in the attic.  The attic?  I mean it's not bad, I'd totally stay there, it's nice and big.  But it actually does look like maybe that's the room from whose windows the children jumped at the beginning.  I don't know for sure.  But when you look at the pictures, the mom in the pictures looks a hell of a lot like the woman who ushered him up to the attic.  So, are the girls the daughters of the lady that works at the inn?  Or was she their nanny?  Is the inn the place where they lived?  Because I assumed when I heard there was a fancy house he was going to have to unload, that it would be the house from which they jumped.

BUT Kipps's boss did say that the widow Drablow only had a son.  And he died.

So, in the morning, Arthur Kipps goes off to meet with good old uncooperative Jerome.  Jerome basically just shoos him out - won't even talk of anything.  Insists the Gifford Arms is packed all week, insists there's no use in discussing the property, tells him he needs to get off to London straightaway.  Kipps is like, fine I'll call the firm.  Jerome is like, no phones noplace, no way.  Kipps says, fine I'll wire them.  Jerome says, "Post office is closed on Wednesday morning.  Your luggage is outside, you're going back to London today."

Kipps pays the coachman to take him out to Eel Marsh House, which is pretty much on an eely marsh.  But it's more of a horrible broken down mansion than a house.  The coachman is also not too keen on ever coming back to pick him up, which, come ON, coachman, don't be like that.

So inside EMH, he discovers information about the son, Nathaniel, that drowned - at age 7 - in the marsh, his body never recovered.

THIS would be when the creepy sounds start.  False alarm!  Just a crow.

But where is that horse neighing and that woman screaming?  And the boy shouting?  There's a car stuck in the - oh hell, that coachman's back.  He takes Kipps to report what he saw to the cops.  Just then, two boys bring in their sister, who drank lye.  So THAT's the end of that child.  God.  No words.

He goes back to the Gifford arms, and has a drink with Mrs. Fisher (Mary Stockley), the lady whose husband runs the place (and probably the mother of those girls at the beginning).  She entreats him to return to London.  Tells him to go home and cherish his son.

He goes off to Sam Daily's to keep the dinner date from the train.  Daily orders Kipps to avoid discussing children at all costs, as Mrs Daily (Janet McTeer) and he lost their son and...as we learn...Mrs Daily believes she is possessed by him.  It's important to note that Daily pretty much always looks horrified, regardless of what's happening.  Kipps and Daily have a heart to heart in which Kipps admits that he still feels his wife is with him, but Daily says it's all shadows and to let the dead go.  Kipps peeks back into the dining room to have a look at the table where Mrs Daily was scratching with a knife when she was having her possessed moment; the scratching resembles a person being hung.  Daily lets Kipps stay the night, since he has no other shelter.

In the morning, they head to Jerome's.  Kipps spies a child behind a locked door; she screams at him to go away, accusing him of having killed the child who had ingested lye.  Outside, the neighbors demand he leave, so Daily tells them he'll take Kipps to the station.  Instead, he drives him over to EMH, with a dog for company.  "Don't go chasing shadows, Arthur," he says before driving away.

Inside EMH, things are dusty and drab but okay on the whole, besides the occasional strange face in the mirror or rustle of skirt around the corner.  At one point, the dog starts barking and takes Kipps outside to Nathaniel's grave.  There is another grave, that of Jennet Humfrye, sister of Alice Drablow. Walking back, Kipps looks up at the house and sees a completely creepy face at the upstairs window, so that's terrifying.  Then he goes up to the same room and looks out the same window and when seen from outside, the same creepy face is looking over his shoulder, so basically GET OUT OF THAT ROOM, but he stays and looks around and finds a letter from the sister Jennet.

The letter says that Alice and her husband basically had Jennet deemed mentally unfit and had her son taken away from her, and raised him as their own.  They didn't give him her birthday cards, etc. and pretended she never existed.  After he died, her letters accuse them of not trying to save him, of only saving themselves, of leaving him to die in the mud.  And finally, her death certificate, reporting suicide.

He falls asleep and when he wakes up, the eyes are scratched out of the picture of Alice and Charles Drablow that he had in front of him.  So I mean.

Now footsteps.  And like a rocking chair.  But the door is locked, so let's get an ax.  Ax involved?  Door opens itself.  Kipps finds the chair rocking back and forth (we can see the creepy face in it) but as he nears, it stops.  Something makes him peel back some wallpaper, and in creepy drippy blood writing it says, YOU COULD HAVE SAVED HIM.  Cue the toy monkey playing the maracas.

Holy shit though - suddenly there's a handprint on the window - Kipps is at the window looking out, because it's raining and it looks like someone is outside - he's on the second floor so he's looking down - so there's a handprint on the window, and he puts his hand up on the print, and when he does, his reflection turns to a woman's reflection and she screams!

Let's go on just a bit and then we can gather our wits.

He goes downstairs, and someone keeps trying to turn the door handle.  Whenever Kipps calls out, nobody answers.  So finally he opens the door.  Several yards from the door are all the damned dead kids - the three girls, the dead boys, probably that lye girl - there are a lot of dead kids.  Just standing around, in their regular little old-time British sailor's outfits.

Now, I know I said we'd gather ourselves, and honestly, that evening just got worse and worse.  That house is fully haunted.  And awesome.

The next day, Daily comes to get him, and takes him back to town, where the Jeromes' house is burning and people are screaming for that little girl they keep locked in the dungeon.  But when Kipps goes in for her, she looks to a woman in black, who nods, basically telling her to self-immolate, which she does.

Daily later explains that the Jeromes had lost their first child (doesn't everyone, in that town?) and decided to have another, Lucy.  They kept Lucy locked up to protect her.

Well, there's a reason everyone loses their children in that town.  The ghost of Jennet Humfrye had her son taken from her, and so she takes everyone else's children.  Every time someone sees her, another child is taken.  And since he saw her in the fire, guess who's next?  His adorable son, who's on his poor little way to this godforsaken shitshow.

Daily and Kipps decide the best thing to do is to dredge up the Drablow's car from the marsh, pull the late Nathaniel from the muck, and hope that doing that can stave off his little child's being taken.  So that happens.  Daily wants to bury him straightaway, but first Kipps gives him all the birthday cards from Jennet and her rosary.  They give him a little ceremony with all his toys in his room, and you'd have to watch this part, because it's cool.

Ultimately, they bury the boy with his mother, and it's a fitting end to that nightmare.  They assume she's gone from the house.  She will never forgive, though.  Never forgive.

ULTIMATE SPOILER

After this - after all of this - he jumped in the freaking muck and pulled out a dead body and then put him in the coffin with his dead mother - this man has been through a lot just to save his own son, okay.  AFTER ALL OF THIS - he goes to the train station to meet his son's train.  Little Joseph and the nanny arrive, and the nanny throws shade when Kipps tells her they're not staying, buy 3 tickets back to London.  Kipps is standing there holding his son's hand and thanking Daily for everything, when suddenly his son wanders off, jumps onto the tracks in front of an oncoming train, Kipps jumps to save him, and when the train passes, it's all, "Daddy, who's that lady?"  "That's your Mummy."  And they died happily ever after.

Are you f#$#$ing kidding me?  TELL ME YOU ARE KIDDING ME.  Because I am not joking you. I just watched that movie, thinking, "Man, I wish I hadn't waited this long, that movie is awesome!" and then I get to the end and I'm like, "At least let Harry Potter live, come on."

Too stupid, too easy, too much.

Availability: DVD, Amazon Prime
Released: 2012
Reason I Watched: No reason.  I love Horror.


Saturday, August 27, 2016

Begin Again

Gretta (Keira Knightley) is a British songwriter living in the U.S. with her boyfriend, Dave Kohl (Adam Levine).  While in the UK they were very much a team, but they were brought to the US by a label that maybe discovered him after his song(s) were in a movie.  Since he's the one that was brought over by a label, he's the one getting all that attention, so she's being treated kind of shiftily.  Then he just goes ahead and ditches her for some chick at the label he's known for a month.

Gretta heads to her mate Steve's place on the Lower East Side, planning a trip back to the UK, but he ropes her into open mic night at Arlene's grocery.

Dan (Mark Ruffalo), a washed-out A&R guy, sees her at Arlene's and can imagine the song with the other instruments.  He pursues her for his old label.  Mos Def, his old partner, isn't having it.  Dan decides to record it alone with her.  Outside.  On the streets.  It's a bit of a rough idea.  They rope in James Corden.  Then Dan recruits a cello and violin player and teaches them the accompaniment parts he imagined at Arlene's, a keyboardist, guitar player and drummer, and suddenly there's a backup band.  That all happens pretty quickly, watch it and find out.

They need bass musicians, which is where Cee Lo Green comes in.  No money, no problem, because Mark Ruffalo is worth it.  [Please note, this is the first person in the movie to give him any credit for being worth a damn, although you can tell deep down his ex-wife (Catherine Keener, whose face is now 75% covered by hair - it's important to see her movies before the eclipse becomes complete) thinks he's alright, although his daughter (Hailee Steinfeld) thinks he's crappy.  Can this new record turn all that around?]

They bond, it's sweet.

Dave Kohl shoots to stardom, claims to be finally achieving his amazing dreams that he never used to have, so that's fabulous.

This movie totally comes together.  Good indie flick.

Availability: Netflix Streaming, Amazon, Hulu
Released: 2013
Reason I watched: Just found it on Netflix today


Sunday, April 12, 2015

Boogeyman 3

I'd seen the first two, which I must have liked okay.  I think I remember the first one, and it was good.  No recollection of the second one.

This one is in a dorm, no recognizable actors, and I really wanted it to end.

Skip it.

Availability: DVD only
Released: 2008
Added to my queue: 10/10/2010
Reason added to my queue: I like to watch things through to the end of the series.  But if there's a Boogeyman 4, count me out.  

Saturday, April 11, 2015

City of Ember

This kind of movie is typically not my fare - and as usual, it's been so long since I added it, I have no idea why I did.  Post-apocalyptic science fiction, I would normally leave on the shelf.  That's probably why (and yes, I know I'm doing this more and more often) it's been sitting here since the beginning of March.

Before I go on, I have to admit: I am really fuzzy on what post-apocalyptic is intended to mean.  I have read the Bible, for what it's worth.  From what I recall and have heard, it involves the "End of Days."  And Judgment Day is in there, where humans are confronted about their beliefs and sent to heaven or hell.  I guess I have two points where I get confused.  My first is, I have for whatever reason understood that Earth would also be destroyed in the apocalypse.  My second is, I have always thought the people would be destroyed in the apocalypse.

These bring me to my main problem with post-apocalyptic movies. Unless they take place on another planet (I suppose I could understand a few people escaping, but if God knew about it, wouldn't he go after them?), it really lowers the believability of the movie AND the Bible for me.

Science fiction, I mean.  I'm not that into science fiction.

Anyway, I had to watch this in order to send it back to Netflix.

The film's main character, Lina Mayfleet (Saorse Ronan, Atonement) is a teenage girl living with her mother (Mary Kay Place), crazy Granny, and little omnivore sister in an underground city in a "post-apocalyptic" situation.  As glamorous as this sounds, it actually sucks, because there's very little freedom and kids are given jobs by picking them out of a bag on a special day.  None of the jobs sound very fun, either.  Nobody gets to be, say, PR executive for cruise ships.  One of my sorority sisters does that and it sounds awesome.

Ember's Mayor (Bill Murray) is a benevolent-dictator type, and when Ember's generator (which keeps the entire city in play) goes on the fritz, he allays concerns by appointing a new (pretend) task force to investigate.  This is not enough for little Lina, and she and her friend Doon (Harry Treadaway) decide to seek further truths...encouraged by Doon's father, Barrow Harrow (at this point, I was too invested to get irritated with the cheese), played by Tim Robbins.

I won't ruin the ending for you, but I ended up finding it engaging and interesting - AND wanted to see how it ended.  It would also make for a fun amusement park ride.

Availability: DVD only
Released: 2008
Added to my queue: 10/10/2010


Reason added to my queue: Oh who knows.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

The Women

Clare Booth Luce's play, The Women, has a special significance for me.  When I was a teenager, in drama class, we had to do two-person scenes from plays, and one of the scenes I chose was from this play.  From that scene, in which a woman discovers that her best friend's husband is having an affair, I was enchanted.  I longed to see a production of the entire play.

Years later, living in Manhattan, I had that chance.  I procured tickets to The Women for a group of my friends, and was able to see the entire juicy story of loyalty, jealousy, betrayal, gossip, catfights, truth, honesty, and friendship that makes women's relationships with each other so delicate, complicated, painful, and hilarious.

There is a movie version from 1939, directed by George Cukor and starring Joan Crawford, which was excellent and MUCH more true to the play....

When I saw that another movie version was being made, I was not inclined to see it, lest they royally screw it up or otherwise ruin it for me.  But somehow, on October 10, 2010, I added it to my Netflix queue, and despite having it in my house since this PAST October, I finally decided to watch it last week.  After all, Meg Ryan, Annette Bening, Jada Pinkett Smith, Debra Messing, Eva Mendes, et al can't ALL be wrong, right?

Actually, right.  While this version is updated for the 21st century (and therefore MUCH more loosely based on the play), this movie is good.  It's all the things I mention above, and a great chick flick.  Plus, as I remembered from the play, there are no men in it.  Literally.  Even the cheating husband never shown in person.

And Meg Ryan's plastic surgery isn't distracting, she looked basically fine, I thought.

Availability: DVD only
Released: 2008
Added to my queue: 10/10/2010
Reason added to my queue: Not sure!?!?



Friday, February 6, 2015

Bangkok Dangerous

I fell in love with Nicolas Cage the first time I saw him.  This was not in Fast Times at Ridgemont High, although if it had been, I'm sure I wouldn't have noticed him.  It has taken subsequent viewings to realize he was even there.

No, friends, my love for Nicolas Cage began with Valley Girl.  That movie is amazing and I've seen it a bazillion times, and shut up if you don't like it because it means you have terrible taste.

Unfortunately, the last Nicolas Cage movie I remember really liking was Face/Off.  That was another excellent movie, where he spent the majority of the film doing his best John Travolta impression, and vice versa - with both succeeding wildly.  

I have not really sought out his movies since then...until Bangkok Dangerous landed in my mailbox from Netflix.  It's in a Halloween envelope, so I'm assuming I've had it since October; I have been studying for a licensure exam, and did not get around to watching it until this week.

Bangkok Dangerous is a decent action movie, with Nicolas Cage playing Joe, an assassin who has traveled to Thailand to do some...assasinating, and Shakrit Yamnarm as his "student" that he begins training, for kind of random reasons even though becoming close to a random guy makes Joe vulnerable to outside attack.  The storyline isn't all that weak.  There's even a sweet romance between Joe and a deaf pharmacy salesgirl, which is a nice break from the action AND a particularly nice break from Cage's voice, since she can't hear him and it is therefore pointless for him to talk.

Which brings me to the crux of my problem here.  Why is Nicolas Cage so bizarre these days?  In days of yore, he just had a very unique look and voice.  These days, he has this jet-black combed-back hair that is ridiculous.  And his voiceover narration of this movie is indescribably annoying.  I have a vocabulary, but cannot find the words to explain what about his voice pins down the annoyingness.

He looks like he's trying to become creepy, and he sounds like he might want to become creepy.  Not in this movie only - in life.  But he's only succeeding in making me want to shake him and say, "WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?  WHY ARE YOU DOING MOVIES LIKE BANGKOK DANGEROUS?"

Twist at end.

**UPDATE**

Clearly I am not in touch with pop culture, and everyone already agrees with me.

https://screen.yahoo.com/weekend-cage-000000506.html
at end.

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

The Foot Fist Way

Okay, so I might be back.

Today, I watched this movie.  The premise is that Tae Kwon Do instructor, Mr. Simmons, played by Danny McBride (of "East Bound and Down" fame), basically is all macho and thinks he has his life by the horns.  In reality, his life is boring, his wife is a whore, and even if any of it is worth hanging on to, he has none of it within his control.  More things happen.  I can't remember how much or how little you want me to spoil on these blog posts.  Characters to watch are Suse, his sometimes sympathetic, sometimes just whorish wife (played by Mary Jane Bostic); Chuck "The Truck" Wallace, (Ben Best), a martial arts icon who is more of a burned out douchebag;  Julio Chavez,  (Spencer Moreno) a "little walls have big ears" kid who looks up to Mr. Simmons and will do anything for him; and, Carlos Lopez (played by Henry Harrison), a meek, skinny teenager - will he ever defeat the tough guy?

Am I glad I watched this movie: I mean, sure.  I didn't not like this movie.  I laughed a few times.  I did not cry.  I found characters interesting enough to want to see good things or bad things happen to them.

Weirdly: I had this sense from the start that it reminded me of Napoleon Dynamite.  DO NOT GO IN THINKING THIS MOVIE WILL REMIND YOU OF NAPOLEON DYNAMITE.  There's just something about the quality of the filming and the extremely understated acting that reminds me of the ND movie.  I do understand that Napoleon Dynamite has reached cult status, and while I have seen it once, I did not then nor do I now appreciate the apparently genius comic writing and acting that is captured in that film.  Forgive me or unfriend me now.  I have seen genius comedy.  I know genius comedy.  That movie is, at best, I mean, I can't even comment on it.  I found it barely funny.  I guess different people find different things amusing, but literal comedic genius is objectively funny.

I was happier than I thought I'd be when I watched the movie, but I also thought it was going to be in Japanese.  I had no idea what to expect.

Availability: DVD only
Released: 2006
Added to my queue: 3/19/2011
Reason added to my queue: Who knows.